
Analysis of Jim Cramer's Mad Money Triple Sell Recommendations
Inspired by the analysis that CXO Advisory Blog has been doing I’ve done an initial analysis on one of Jim Cramer's Mad Money show categories.
I’ve kept records on stocks Jim Cramer has commented on by rating: “Triple sell,” “Best of breed,” “Bull,” “Bear,” and “Stocks he owns.” Picks have also been categorized by the way they were introduced into the show: “Feature,” “Top of show,” “Lightning round,” “Lightning round Cramer,” and “Pick of the week” among others.
I’ll try and work my way through each of these analyses as enough data is accumulated to form a worthy set. Taking this path and analyzing by category just may lend insight to Cramer’s strengths and weaknesses in his evaluation of stocks on his Mad Money television show.
The first analysis I’ve done is that of taking a look at all stocks rated “Triple Sell” by Jim Cramer in his Mad Money shows on the dates of June 21, June 22, June 28, June 30, July 7, July 8, and August 3. These shows provide 31 stocks rated “Triple Sell”.
The 31 stocks rated TRIPLE SELL during those shows: AV, CL, DHB, DRL, ELN, EYET, F, FBR, FBR, FDX, GERN, GMR, HNZ, HOTT, IMX, L, MAT, MRK, NFI, PBY, REV, SCI, SLR, SNIC, STEM, THC, UN, UNP, UPS, VZ, YELL. Note that FBR appears twice. It first appeared in the analysis on 6/21/2005 and again on 7/7/2005, both times in the Lightning Round.
Of the stocks in the set, 24 came from the Lightning Round segment, 2 from caller questions, 2 were Cramer thoughts, one stock from Mad Mail, one from a feature segment, and one from a show guest segment.
Calculating the Returns
I’ve calculated the average returns for the entire list from the closing price day after mention to closing price one week, two weeks, four weeks and eight weeks after mention. I’ve also compared the average return to that of the SPY (S&P 500 Depository Receipts), IWM (iShares Russell 2000), and QQQQ (Nasdaq 100 Trust Series 1) during the same time period. Stocks were compared individually to the corresponding market return for the time period and the whole was averaged to achieve the percentage point difference versus each market.

Conclusions:
You can see the Jim Cramer’s “Triple Sell” picks actually outperformed the market in most cases, with exceptions being the underperfofmance for the 4 Week Return vs. S&P 500 and the 8 Week Return vs. all indices. It appears from this analysis that Cramer may be issuing “Triple Sells” to stocks that display longer termed weakness without accounting for what they do in the short term. Jim Cramer’s “Triple Sell” recommendations actually outperform the market over shorter durations of one, two and four weeks, while the underperformance one would expect from a “Triple Sell” doesn’t show up until eight weeks out.
Notes:
Transaction costs were not included in this analysis.
Prices used were obtained from Yahoo Finance through XLQ.
Triple Sells used by date of mention:
6/21/2005: FBR, HOTT, SCI, GMR, EYET, NFI, F, UN, SNIC
6/22/2005: DRL, MAT, GERN
6/28/2005: HNZ, PBY, SLR, STEM
6/30/2005: THC, REV
7/7/2005: IMX, DHB, ELN, FBR, MRK, UNP
7/8/2005: FDX, UPS, YELL, VZ, AV
8/3/2005: CL, L
-----
This posting also found at www.reasonedinvesting.com
It looks like Business Week readers are beginning to trickle in as the magazine now has reached the homes of subscribers. For those of you visiting for the first time I want to point you to a study I did late last week that looks ... Read
Cramer likes LNG (Cheniere Energy) as more than anything else in the world Cheniere needs the blessing of the Fed regulators. Cramer believes that the regulatory commission is going to rule in their favor because they just hired the consulting firm owned by former Secretary ... Read
I spent the evening working on the Triple Sell Analysis I'm about to post. I'll have the 10/20/2005 Mad Money show up tomorrow night. ----- This posting also available at www.reasonedinvesting.com Read
“This is what the bottom looks like!” Today’s stock market rally was significant and mattered according to Cramer, who said it signaled the beginning of a fourth quarter rally. The day started out about as ugly as ever with disappointing headlines from Intel (INTC), bad ... Read
