PFBlog logo

My First Million

Lessons learned from a cautious investor who has already made it.

  Channel Home | About (4) | Commentary (8) | Index Fund Debate (12) | Long-Term Care (6) | Money Saving Tips (7) | My Medical Insurance Mess (6) | Portfolio (11) | Retirement (10) | Rewards: Alaskan Cruise (4) | The Test of Time (5) | Tools (6) | Contact Me
null

My International Funds: Q3 2005 YTD review

Have my international funds continued to outperform a broadly diversified international stock index? What, if anything, am I giving up in tax efficiency for being in actively managed vs. passively managed index funds?

For this post, I used Morningstar's "fund compare" tool to review YTD returns and tax efficiency for my two international funds. Vanguard's Total International Stock Index Fund (VGTSX) results have also been included -- serving as my benchmark.

My funds

Dodge & Cox International (DODFX) -- open to new investors

Fidelity Diversified International (FDIVX) -- closed to new investors

Why two international funds? I want to increase my allocation to international, and Fidelity is the only attractive alternative in my retirement accounts at work.

The benchmark

Vanguard's Total International Stock Index Fund (VGTSX) has been used as the benchmark, representing a broadly diversified index of the total international stock market.

Morningstar's results and my comments follow.

Return: My two funds compared with the benchmark

q3 international perf.gif

My comments

- My two funds, along with the benchmark, all performed well for the first nine months of the year:
- - D&C International = 11.62% YTD
- - Fidelity Diversified International = 11.45% YTD
- - The benchmark = 10.79% YTD

- For the first nine months of 2005, returns for both my international funds beat the benchmark.

- For 1-year returns, Dodge & Cox beat the benchmark; Fidelity lagged.

- For 3-year returns, Dodge & Cox beat the benchmark by a wide margin (34.45% vs. 26.88%); Fidelity narrowly beat the benchmark.

Tax cost ratio: My two funds compared with the benchmark

q3 international tax.gif

My comments

- For 3-year tax cost ratio**, both my funds outperformed the benchmark by a reasonable margin. While D&C does not have a 5 year history, Fidelity's 5-year tax cost ratio beat the benchmark by a small amount.

** Tax cost ratio represents the percentage-point reduction in an annualized return that results from income taxes. The calculation assumes investors pay the maximum federal rate on capital gains and ordinary income. A smaller number means LESS taxes.

Caveat

- Over long periods of time, index funds have outperformed approximately 90% of managed funds. Long term investors should give strong consideration to index funds. Learn more about actively vs. passively managed funds by reading the index fund debate.

- The benchmark in this comparison represents the total international stock index. Investors may also choose to hold more narrowly focused index funds -- of which, some have outperformed the broad index.

Related links

- My Balanced Fund: Q3 2005 YTD review
- My Bond Fund: Q3 2005 YTD review
- Don't miss this popular series: The index fund debate
- Learn how you may be able to lower costs when purchasing mutual funds
- See how my retirement plan withstands the test of time

about - feedback - disclaimer
mortgage calculator

pf-recom.GIF

VirtualBank gives you up to 5.13% APY for your savings!
Blue Cash from American Express: 5% Back on Gas, Up to 5% cash back on eligible purchases, No Annual Fee, 0% Introductory APR for 6 months, Pay over time
• Try Starwood Preferred Guest Credit Card from American Express. Great rewards and first year fee free!
Bad Credit Home Loans
Life Insurance in 10 minutes if qualified. No medical exam.
What do you think of this post? Be the first to share your opinions.

Enjoy the latest personal finance news and commentary at PFBlog Network.
Similar Posts

My Balanced Fund: Q3 2005 YTD review (October 02, 2005)
Has my balanced fund continued to outperform a broadly diversified balanced index fund? What, if anything, am I giving up in tax efficiency for being in an actively managed vs. passively managed index fund? For this post, I used Morningstar's "fund compare" tool to review ... Read
My Bond Fund: Q3 2005 YTD review (October 02, 2005)
Has my bond fund continued to outperform a broadly diversified bond index? How is my fund doing when compared to individual bonds? What, if anything, am I giving up in tax efficiency for being in an actively managed vs. passively managed index fund? For this ... Read
V. What happens if I assume more market risk? (September 28, 2005)
While my current plan and asset allocation are on solid ground, I wondered what will happen as I continue to increase the allocation to equities in my portfolio (which I am doing via dollar cost averaging). So in this test, I compare my current asset ... Read

Read all 11 articles in the same category.
Comments

Mail This Post
Email addresses will never be collected or sold.
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):



Read More ... All Other Posts In The Same Category

PREMIUM SPONSORS

Payday Loan
Personal Loan
Homeowner Loans UK
Commercial Mortgages and Business Loans
UK Used Car Loans
Mortgage Refinancing
Student Loan Consolidation.com
Secured Homeowner Loans
Bad Credit Loans - Free Quote
Gold Coins


SITE REVIEWS

Secured Loan UK
UK Home Loans


Google
Web PFBlog

WHAT I READ

WSJ

PFBlog

POWERED BY

Join the world's largest Web Host! Movable Type 2.64