|
|
... |
Tax-Free Income for AllIf you are among those who are ineligible to contribute to Roth IRA, you might want to carefully consider the option of tax free portfolio growth that is enabled in the latest tax law revision. You can open an account of non-deduction traditional IRA and contribute up to $5,000 annually, and convert the non-deduction IRA to Roth IRA after 2010. This strategy will, of course, require multi-year and even multi-decade planning. I might have to reconsider my retirement savings strategy with this new option since I'm priced out of Roth IRA too. From Kiplinger's Personal Finance:
This post has 3 comments. Read and share your opinions.
Enjoy the latest personal finance news and commentary at PFBlog Network.
|
Social Security Administration announced that starting from 2007, social security and supplement security income benefits will increase by 3.3% next year. At the same time, for those of you who are paying to the social security pool, up to $97,500 of your 2007 income is ...
CNNMoney gave a detailed breakdown of all changes in the new Pension Protection Act of 2006. Of all the changes, most meaningful one is perhaps the automatic enrollment, which should have a material impact on the national's savings rate after a couple of years. Maybe ...
WSJ's senior write Perri Capell's early retirement announcement generated a lot of discussion, and hence Perri is providing more context to her decision. To evaluate myself against the three early retirement signs Perri mentioned: 1. A sense that I would regret working full time any ...
I have always been plagued by the $100,000 income cap on tradional-IRA-to-Roth IRA conversion. However, although our 401(k) balance is much higher than Roth IRA balance in our last monthly tally ($84,000 vs $13,000), we will most likely choose not to convert, since our tax ...
I believe the problem is that if you already have a deductible IRA, then when you convert to a Roth, you will be converting some of the deductible contributions and some of the non-deductible contributions. Apparently you cannot convert only the nondeductible portion.
For example, if you have $20,000 in total IRA and the non-dedcutible basis is $10,000. Let's say you convert $10,000 of that into a Roth. You will have to pay taxes on $5000 of that conversion because only 50% of your total IRA is non-deductible.
This was in a letter in the most recent issue of the magazine.
Sucks.
What's Next In Science & Technology
What's Next In Health
I continue to have my suspicious about the "generosity" of the government willing to let you grow your money tax free for ever. I highly suspect that as the baby boomers retire en-mass around 2011 that a tax on Roth IRA will suddenly emerge. I'm opting to max my 401k and contribute to Roth as long as I can. My income keeps growing and I'll be out of bounds within two or three years.
I've heard about the restrictions on converting deductible / non-deductible IRAs and actually I've heard many varients. Most seem to be uninformed scuttlbutt, the problem is how to get to the truth of the matter?
I'd rather find an authoritative source then spend $$ on my accountants oppinion.
Regards,
makingourway
