PFBlog logo

My Personal Finance Journey

Personal finance observation, musing and decisions in a journey toward financial independence by 36 with at least $1 million.

  Home | Feed: feed-icon.gif | About | Progress: June 07: $756,924 | Best of PFBlog | Product Reviews | PFBlog Digest | Disclaimer | Advertise | Contact Me

...

Tax-Free Income for All





If you are among those who are ineligible to contribute to Roth IRA, you might want to carefully consider the option of tax free portfolio growth that is enabled in the latest tax law revision. You can open an account of non-deduction traditional IRA and contribute up to $5,000 annually, and convert the non-deduction IRA to Roth IRA after 2010. This strategy will, of course, require multi-year and even multi-decade planning. I might have to reconsider my retirement savings strategy with this new option since I'm priced out of Roth IRA too.

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance:

Under current law, you can't contribute to a Roth if you are single and have an income of more than $110,000, or married with a joint income in excess of $160,000. The new law, which goes into effect in 2010, does not alter the income limits for Roth IRA contributions. But it does eliminate the $100,000 income limit for converting a traditional IRA to a Roth. You must pay income taxes at your top rate on the total amount you convert to a Roth -- that's the price you pay to make all withdrawals tax-free in retirement. To encourage conversions, which will bolster U.S. Treasury coffers in the short run and save you loads on taxes over time, Congress says that folks who convert in 2010 can spread the tab over 2011 and 2012.

By opening the back door to Roth conversions for everyone, Congress effectively wiped out the limit on pay-ins, too. And high-income taxpayers can waltz through the door right away. Starting in 2006, you can contribute $4,000 a year to a nondeductible traditional IRA, or $5,000 if you are 50 or older. (The limits rise to $5,000 and $6,000 in 2008.) In January 2010, when the income limits disappear, you can convert the traditional IRA to a Roth IRA and owe tax only on the earnings.

This post has 3 comments. Read and share your opinions.

Enjoy the latest personal finance news and commentary at PFBlog Network.
Similar Posts

Next Year's Maximum Income Subject To Social Security Tax: $97,500 (October 20, 2006)
Social Security Administration announced that starting from 2007, social security and supplement security income benefits will increase by 3.3% next year. At the same time, for those of you who are paying to the social security pool, up to $97,500 of your 2007 income is ...
401(k)s in Maximum Overdrive (August 10, 2006)
CNNMoney gave a detailed breakdown of all changes in the new Pension Protection Act of 2006. Of all the changes, most meaningful one is perhaps the automatic enrollment, which should have a material impact on the national's savings rate after a couple of years. Maybe ...
Three Signs That You're Ready for Early Retirement (July 23, 2006)
WSJ's senior write Perri Capell's early retirement announcement generated a lot of discussion, and hence Perri is providing more context to her decision. To evaluate myself against the three early retirement signs Perri mentioned: 1. A sense that I would regret working full time any ...
Upcoming Bill to Allow Wealthier Taxpayers to Convert to Roth IRA (May 6, 2006)
I have always been plagued by the $100,000 income cap on tradional-IRA-to-Roth IRA conversion. However, although our 401(k) balance is much higher than Roth IRA balance in our last monthly tally ($84,000 vs $13,000), we will most likely choose not to convert, since our tax ...

Read all 9 articles in the same category.
Comments
>>> What's Next In Science & Technology Commented on August 6, 2006

I believe the problem is that if you already have a deductible IRA, then when you convert to a Roth, you will be converting some of the deductible contributions and some of the non-deductible contributions. Apparently you cannot convert only the nondeductible portion.

For example, if you have $20,000 in total IRA and the non-dedcutible basis is $10,000. Let's say you convert $10,000 of that into a Roth. You will have to pay taxes on $5000 of that conversion because only 50% of your total IRA is non-deductible.

This was in a letter in the most recent issue of the magazine.

Sucks.

What's Next In Science & Technology
What's Next In Health


>>> Rich Slick Commented on August 7, 2006

I continue to have my suspicious about the "generosity" of the government willing to let you grow your money tax free for ever. I highly suspect that as the baby boomers retire en-mass around 2011 that a tax on Roth IRA will suddenly emerge. I'm opting to max my 401k and contribute to Roth as long as I can. My income keeps growing and I'll be out of bounds within two or three years.


>>> makingourway Commented on August 7, 2006

I've heard about the restrictions on converting deductible / non-deductible IRAs and actually I've heard many varients. Most seem to be uninformed scuttlbutt, the problem is how to get to the truth of the matter?
I'd rather find an authoritative source then spend $$ on my accountants oppinion.

Regards,
makingourway



Read More ... All Other Posts In The Same Category

PREMIUM SPONSORS

Car Loans
Dallas Bankruptcy Attorney
Personal Loans
Car Finance
Homeowner Loans
Cheap Car Insurance
Mortgages UK & CCJ Mortgage
Used Cars
Loans
Commercial Mortgages and Business Loans
Guaranteed Car Finance
Payday Loan
Personal Loan
Student Loan Consolidation.com
Secured Loans
Bad Credit Loans - Free Quote