PFBlog logo

My Personal Finance Journey

Personal finance observation, musing and decisions in a journey toward financial independence by 36 with at least $1 million.

  Home | Feed: feed-icon.gif | About | Progress: June 07: $756,924 | Best of PFBlog | Product Reviews | PFBlog Digest | Disclaimer | Advertise | Contact Me

...

Too Rich for a 401(k)?





Fortunately we have too many "highly compensated employees" at Microsoft so I will only know of this on paper instead of reality.

PFBlog readers, have you been penalized for being highly compensated?

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance:

This is the time of year a lot of readers are confused by what I call "boomerang 401(k) contributions." This happens when company retirement plans kick out some of the contributions made during the previous year by highly compensated employees -- generally those who make more than $95,000 a year.

Such corrective distributions are required if the plan discovers that highly paid employees contributed too much of their salaries compared with the amount contributed by lower-paid workers. This test is required by Congress to prevent the tax benefits of 401(k)s from going disproportionately to higher-paids. Because the test can't be completed until after the plan year closes, the checks for any excess contributions are mailed out after January 1.

This post has 3 comments. Read and share your opinions.

Enjoy the latest personal finance news and commentary at PFBlog Network.
Similar Posts

Three Signs That You're Ready for Early Retirement (July 23, 2006)
WSJ's senior write Perri Capell's early retirement announcement generated a lot of discussion, and hence Perri is providing more context to her decision. To evaluate myself against the three early retirement signs Perri mentioned: 1. A sense that I would regret working full time any ...
Upcoming Bill to Allow Wealthier Taxpayers to Convert to Roth IRA (May 6, 2006)
I have always been plagued by the $100,000 income cap on tradional-IRA-to-Roth IRA conversion. However, although our 401(k) balance is much higher than Roth IRA balance in our last monthly tally ($84,000 vs $13,000), we will most likely choose not to convert, since our tax ...
The Cullens Are Millionaires! (March 12, 2006)
WSJ columnist Terri Cullen, who reported on personal finance blogs a year ago among the first in major financial media, achieved million-dollar-net-worth milestone lately. For those who is still working toward the millionaire status, Terri shares why a million dollars does not mean everything. To ...
One-Person 401k's May Make Sense for Owner-only Businesses (August 30, 2005)
Good starting point to understand the solo 401(k).

Read all 9 articles in the same category.
Comments
>>> John Commented on March 13, 2006

It happens to us every year. My wife makes good money and her company's employees are young and contribute very little to their 401ks. Any "excess" is forced back the next year and required to be reported on the prior year tax return. Tax penalties will mostly ensue. Therefore, we contribute very little to her 401K to avoid the problem. Even though congress allows more money to be put into the 401ks every year for most people, it does not apply to people making 95K a year. A 401k is a stupid government program that prevents the most productive people in society from saving for retirement.


>>> Personal Finance Blogger Commented on May 6, 2006

Yep - Last year I moved into the 'highly compensated' realm... We're also not eligible for Roth IRAs due to our combined income being too high.

Interestingly enough my contribution limit was just raised from 10% of salary to 16%... Not sure if the federal rules changed or participation levels rose enough...


>>> Brian Commented on May 10, 2006

I think that's a bit short-sighted to say that "a 401K is a stupid government program that prevents the most productive people in society from saving for retirement". While I applaud the success of you and your wife, there are more people in the US who need the tax advantages a 401K provides to have any chance of securing a retirement whatsoever.

I can see your point in terms of where the limitations are too stringent for your combined level of income, but those who make substantially less (and sometimes have careers that are equally as beneficial to society, it not as well-paid) need those tax advantages. I would argue that anyone who's making over six-figures and feels prevented from saving from retirement needs to learn to live more conservatively.



Read More ... All Other Posts In The Same Category

PREMIUM SPONSORS

Car Loans
Dallas Bankruptcy Attorney
Personal Loans
Car Finance
Homeowner Loans
Cheap Car Insurance
Mortgages UK & CCJ Mortgage
Used Cars
Loans
Commercial Mortgages and Business Loans
Guaranteed Car Finance
Payday Loan
Personal Loan
Student Loan Consolidation.com
Secured Loans
Bad Credit Loans - Free Quote