PFBlog logo

Blueprint for Financial Prosperity

A helpful guide to financial security, independence and untold riches.

  Channel Home | General (25) | Hearth and Home (20) | Insurance (4) | Investing (20) | Product Review (9) | Shopping (23) | Taxes (5) |
Contact Me: blueprint2 at pfblog.com
null

401k Front Loaded versus Incremental Contributions

Originally published at Blueprint for Financial Prosperity, a PFBlog Network contributor. If you'd like to leave comments, please do so here; Thanks!

Let's say in a fictional world you have enough money and you are paid enough money that you can contribute the entire amount allotted for a 401k pre-tax contribution in one lump sum at the end of January. Then, let us also assume that your 401k appreciates 1% each month for an annual yield of 11.56% (it's only 11 months because your January contribution comes at the end of the month), which is a close enough approximation of the S&P's historical growth. Is it significantly beneficial for you to contribute it all at once or incrementally? ($1272.72 a month, which would put you 8 cents shy of $14k, but accurate enough...)

Well, I've wondered so I put it in Excel to see if it really mattered... and it does matter. Given those assumptions, the year end difference amounts to about $743. That $743, which doesn't seem like a lot, accounts for over half the gain of the lump sum contribution and 4.81% of the value of the total lump sum contribution account. Below is a table:

MonthIncremental TotalLump TotalDifference
jan$1272.72$14000$0
feb$2558.17$14140$127.27
mar$3856.47$14281.40$243.09
apr$5167.75$14424.21$347.34
may$6492.15$14568.46$439.91
jun$7829.79$14714.14$520.67
jul$9180.81$14861.28$589.51
aug$10545.34$15009.89$646.32
sept$11923.51$15159.99$690.96
oct$13315.47$15311.59$723.33
nov$14721.34$15464.71$743.29
(Difference refers to the difference in gains)

This is in the optimal case (market is rising, you buy in at the cheapest point with a front loaded 401k) with a lot of assumptions that don't necessarily hold true. If the market drops, you would lose more in the front loaded 401k than if you contributed incrementally. This is also sort of an analysis of the "dollar cost averaging" concept where you enter a position incrementally. If you believe in dollar cost averaging then you would never consider a front loaded contribution into your 401k.

I don't know anyone who really front-loads their 401k, none of my friends make enough for this to be even feasible, but it also appears that it would make a significant difference. So if you make enough or have faith in the market, try to contribute as much as you can as early as you can (why some people contribute to a Roth as soon as possible). If you want to go the way of dollar cost averaging, then keep doing it the old fashioned way, a little bit at a time.mortgage calculator

pf-recom.GIF

VirtualBank gives you up to 5.13% APY for your savings!
Blue Cash from American Express: 5% Back on Gas, Up to 5% cash back on eligible purchases, No Annual Fee, 0% Introductory APR for 6 months, Pay over time
• Try Starwood Preferred Guest Credit Card from American Express. Great rewards and first year fee free!
Bad Credit Home Loans
Life Insurance in 10 minutes if qualified. No medical exam.
What do you think of this post? Be the first to share your opinions.

Enjoy the latest personal finance news and commentary at PFBlog Network.
Similar Posts


Comments

Mail This Post
Email addresses will never be collected or sold.
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):









PREMIUM SPONSORS

Payday Loan
Personal Loan
Homeowner Loans UK
Commercial Mortgages and Business Loans
UK Used Car Loans
Mortgage Refinancing
Student Loan Consolidation.com
Secured Homeowner Loans
Bad Credit Loans - Free Quote
Gold Coins


SITE REVIEWS

Secured Loan UK
UK Home Loans


Google
Web PFBlog

WHAT I READ

Blueprint for Financial Prosperity

Five Cent Nickel

All Things Financial

Free Money Finance

Consumerism Commentary

PFBlog

POWERED BY

Join the world's largest Web Host! Movable Type 2.64